Uncategorized
...now browsing by category
Psychiatry Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA)
Saturday, June 26th, 2010Six months ago I wrote about the change from oral board examinations in Psychiatry to a series of clinical skills assessments to be done by members of the resident’s training program. I had some concerns at that time about the change; I tend to do well on oral examinations and believe that with a couple helpful bits of advice, every candidate with a reasonable fund of knowledge can do well. I have received good feedback about the approach taken in my recordings, which is to learn the basics so darn well, through repetition day after day, that intelligent discussion comes to mind automatically– even during moments of anxiety-provoked brain freeze!
My reservation about the change from Oral Board to CSA was concern over the residents own faculty performing the examinations. On one hand such an arrangement could provide an unfair advantage, but I am more concerned over the disadvantage from being examined by someone who perhaps has negative preconceptions from prior courses or clinical work. The change from orals to CSA seemed to drastic; the policy in the former was to exclude anyone who had ANY knowledge of the candidate, and the new format guarantees that most or all of the examiners will know something about the candidate! On the other hand, having knowledge of the candidate is not completely unique. I think back to my PhD disseration, which like all dissertations was presented to my thesis committee and to the university at large.
After serving as a Clinical Skills Assessment examiner several months ago, I have a better feeling about the new system. The format is actually identical to the format of the clinical interview portion of the old Oral Boards. The ‘vignette’ sections were eliminated, although that may be changed going forward. I made a couple small changes to the recordings to account for the change in format, and all of my comments in prior posts remain valid– for those of you who take the time to read them! Bottom line, I stand by my recommendation to use the recordings during your commute, ideally for weeks or even months before the exam. Talk back to the recordings out loud to become completely familiar with the criteria for psychiatric disorders. Doing so will guarantee your ability to provide an intelligent differential diagnosis as you run through the critera with ease!
Best of luck in your examinations and careers,
Jeffrey T Junig MD PhD
Psychiatry Part II: Horses, not Zebras!
Monday, March 30th, 2009Like most Board Certification examinations, the proving ground for psychiatry covers two areas. Part I makes sure that the candidate has the ‘facts’– all of the things that are picked up during residency didactics and personal reading, including the different types of aphasia (ick), the metabolic derangements that affect brain development (ugh), or the specific pharmaco-kinetics of each therapeutic agent (I actually like that stuff!).
If you are reading this after searching for ‘part II preparation’, you have made it– you won’t neeed to really memorize that material for another ten years– for recertification! (sorry).
Part II is different– you need a totally different set of skills. You need to think on your feet. You need to diagnose on the ‘fly’. You need a bit of confidence. You need the basics down cold.
That is why I focus on these recordings so much– they are 90% of what you need! They improve the basics– dramatically. And they provide confidence– Think about it– think about how it would feel to KNOW, for CERTAIN, that the criteria will come to mind no matter how threatening the case?
If you can talk CRITERIA during the exam, and point out how the criteria match up with your patient, you are SET for Part II.